Metacognitive Education in Improving Student's Interpersonal Intelligence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32332/tapis.v5i2.4151Keywords:
Metacognitive Education, Intrapersonal Intelligence, StudentsAbstract
Intrapersonal intelligence is necessary for everyone to advance more competent abilities and personalities. As a result, initiatives to develop intelligence must be addressed, one of which is metacognitive education. Metacognition is seen to have a tight relationship with intrapersonal intelligence. Its concepts and theories have a number of similarities. This research was a qualitative study using a library research method which was used to acquire research data by reading, listening to, and interpreting both written and recorded books, notes, reports, and journals. The findings of this study suggest that students' intrapersonal intelligence may potentially be increased by metacognitive education using a set of acceptable techniques developed by education specialists.
References
Astuti, F. F., & Zulhakim, A. (2021). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Motivasi Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Di SD Negeri 115 Bengkulu Selatan. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Al-Affan, Vol. 1(2), 8.
Bernadeta, L. S. (2017). Aktualisasi Diri Generasi Y di Instagram. Interaksi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, Vol. 6(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.14710/interaksi.6.1.93-109
Binbasaran Tuysuzoglu, B., & Greene, J. A. (2015). An Investigation of The Role of Contingent Metacognitive Behavior in Self-Regulated Learning. Metacognition and Learning, 10(1), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-014-9126-y
Blakey, E., & Spence, S. (1990). Developing Metacognition. Eric Digest. Retrived from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED327218.pdf
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (nd). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Canada: Longmans.
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to Assess Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Your Classroom. Alexandria, Va: ASCD.
Chu, H. (2015). Research methods in library and information science: A content analysis. Library & Information Science Research, 37(1), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2014.09.003
Danandjaja, J. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Antropologi Indonesia, Vol. 7(52). https://doi.org/10.7454/ai.v0i52.3318
Deliany, Z., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2020). Metacognitive Reading Strategies Awareness and Metacognitive Reading Strategies Use Of Efl University Students Across Gender. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 421–437. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.17026
Gardner, H. (2011). Howard Gardner: Frames of Mind The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
Harahap, N. (2014). Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jurnal Iqra’, Vol. 8(01).
Harumi, B. P. Y., & Marheni, A. (2018). Peran Konsep Diri dan Efikasi Diri Terhadap Kematangan Karier Mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Unviversitas Udayana. Jurnal Psikologi Udayana, Vol. 5(01), 23. https://doi.org/10.24843/JPU.2018.v05.i01.p03
Herlanti, Y. (2015). Kesadaran Metakognitif dan Pengetahuan Metakognitif Peserta Didik Sekolah Menengah Atas dalam Mempersiapkan Ketercapaian Standar Kelulusan pada Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v3i3.7343
Indarini, E., Sadono, T., & Onate, M. E. (2013b). Pengetahuan Metakognitif Untuk Pendidik dan Peserta Didik. Satya Widya, Vol. 29(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.sw.2013.v29.i1.p40-46
Juatiningsih, & Suendarti, M. (2019). Pengaruh Kecerdasan Intrapersonal dan Kemampuan Berpikir Positif terhadap Kemampuan Penguasaan Konsep Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (Survei Pada SMP Negeri di Kota Cilegon). Alfarisi: Jurnal Pendidikn MIPA, Vol. 2(1).
Kralik, J. D., Lee, J. H., Rosenbloom, P. S., Jackson, P. C., Epstein, S. L., Romero, O. J., … McGreggor, K. (2018). Metacognition for a Common Model of Cognition. Procedia Computer Science, 145, 730–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.11.046
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
Ku, K. Y. L., & Ho, I. T. (2010). Metacognitive strategies that enhance critical thinking. Metacognition and Learning, Vol. 5(3), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-010-9060-6
Lepskiy, V. (2018). Decision Support Ontologies in Self-Developing Reflexive-Active Environments. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(30), 504–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.11.276
Kristiawan, M., Suhono, S., Yussof, M. H. B., & Muslimah, M. (2021). The International School’s Culture in Indonesia and Brunei Darussalam. Jurnal Iqra': Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(1), 180-191.
Maryati, T., Khasanah, S. U., & Maf’ula, V. Y. (2020). Contribution of Teacher’s Teaching Skills and Students’ Intrapersonal Intelligence Toward Metacognitive Awareness of Students in State Vocational School in Blitar. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1470, 012045. Yogyakarta: IOP Science. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012045
Marzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (2007). The new taxonomy of educational objectives (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Mulyana, B. (2014). Hubungan Konsep Diri, Komitmen, dan Motivasi Berprestasi dengan Prestasi Renang Gaya Bebas. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v3i3.1636
Nur’aini. (2020). Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Metakognisi Melalui Strategi Pembelajaran PAI Berbasis DDCT Pada Mahasiswa Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Ibnu Sina Batam. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Al-Thariqah, 5(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.25299/al-thariqah.2020.vol5(1).4682
Peking, B. S., & Utami, F. B. (2020). Kecerdasan Intrapersonal Anak Usia 4-5 Tahun: Studi di Tkk 6 Penabur Kelapa Gading, Jakarta Utara. Vol. 01(01), 12.
Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The Role of Metacognitive Knowledge in Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. Taylor & Francis Group, 41(4,), 219–225.
Sari, D. P., Usodo, B., & Subanti, S. (2018). Metacognitive Experience of Mathematics Education Students in Open Start Problem Solving Based on Intrapersonal Intelligence. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1008, 012062. Jember: IOP Science. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1008/1/012062
Sari, M., & Asmendri. (2020). Penelitian Kepustakaan (Library Research) dalam Penelitian Pendidikan IPA. Natural Science, Vol. 6(1).
Sari, Y. A., Septiyana, L., Suhono, S., Anggaira, A. S., & Umar Al Faruq, A. H. (2021). Corrective Feedback in Learning Interaction: Integration of Surface Strategy Taxonomy. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(3), 2266-2280.
Soinbala, H., & Mulyatna, F. (2019). Penerapan Strategi Pembelajaran Metakognitif dalam Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Matematika. De Fermat : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, Vol. 2(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.36277/defermat.v2i1.39
Starkey, L. B. (Ed.). (2010). Reasoning skills success in 20 minutes a day (2nd ed.). New York: LearningExpress.
Stayanchi, J. (2017). Higher-Order Thinking Through Bloom’s Taxonomy. Core. Ac.Uk, Vol. 22, 8.
Sugiono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan A&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suralaga, F. (2021). Psikologi Pendidikan: Implikasi dalam Pembelajaran. Depok: Rajawali Press.
Werdiningsih, D. (2015). Strategi Metakognisi Pembelajar Anak dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di Sekolah Dasara. (1), 11.
Winne, P. H. (1996). A metacognitive View of Individual Differences in Self-Regulated Learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8(4), 327–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90022-9