Otoritas Sahih Bukhari Sebagai Kitab Hadis Rujukan Dalam Hukum Islam

Authors

  • Chamim Tohari University Muhammadiyah Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32332/istinbath.v18i2.3171

Keywords:

Sahih al-Bukhari, Hadith, Ijtihad, Science, Qaidah Fiqh

Abstract

The study discusses the authority of the traditions in the book of Sahih al-Bukhari, as one of the main sources of reference for hadith in establishing Islamic law after the Qur'an. This study is intended to answer questions about the authority of the Book of Sahih al-Bukhari in terms of historical perspectives, fiqh Qaida, and modern science. This research is library research that uses content analysis as a method of analyzing the data obtained. In addition, this study also uses comparative analysis to answer the problem of hadith authority in Sahih al-Bukhari when viewed from the perspective of Qaida fiqh. In this study, there are three important points, first, the book of Sahih al-Bukhari until now is known as the book of hadith with the highest level of validity compared to other hadith books. However, as a human creation, the book of Sahih al-Bukhari does not escape criticism from its readers, one of which is because Al-Bukhari is considered close to the authorities. Second, in Sahih al-Bukhari there are traditions whose editorials contradict higher texts, and modern science. Third, as a result of al-Bukhari's ijtihad in the field of the authenticity of hadith as well as in the field of fiqh, and his position is sometimes considered higher than other hadith books. The researcher argues that the criticism that states Imam Bukhari was close to the ruler is not appropriate, but the political influence in the writing process cannot be fanned, while regarding the conflict between the hadith texts in the book of Bukhari and the texts of the Qur'an, history, and science, it is necessary deeper study, then the book of Sahih al-Bukhari should be positioned on a par with other hadith books.

References

Al-Asqalani, Ibnu Hajar. Syarah Nuhbah al-Fikr fî Musthalâhah Ahli al-Atsar. Dâr al-Kutub al-Ilmiah, Beirut,1934.
……………………….... Tahzib al-Tahzib, Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, tth.
Al-Hasani, Hasyim Ma'ruf. Tinjauan Ahli Hadis Terhadap Imam Bukhari dan Karyanya, Jurnal al-Hikmah, Edisi Nopember-Februari 1991.
Al-Khatib, Muhammad 'Ajjaj. Ushul al-Hadits: Ulumuha wa Musthalahuhu, Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1989.
Al-Shalih, Shubkhi. Ushul al-Hadits: Ulumuhu wa Musthalahuhu, Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1989.
Al-Siba’i, Musthafa. Sunnah dan peranannya dalam penetapan hukum Islam, diterjemahkan oleh Nur Kholis Madjid. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 1993.
Dzulmani, Mengenal Kitab-Kitab Hadis, Yogyakarta: Insan Madani, 2008.
Hosen, Nadirsyah. Islam Yes, Khilafah No, Jilid 2, Yogyakarta: SUKA Press, 2019.
Humaidi, M. Nurul. Telaah atas Kitab Shahih Al-Bukhari, Jurnal Ulumuddin, Nomor 02, Tahun IX, Edisi Juli-Desember 2006.
Ichwan, Muhammad Nor. Studi Ilmu Hadis, Semarang: Rasail, 2007.
Pimpinan Pusat Majlis Tarjih, Manhaj Tarjih Muhammadiyah, Makalah disampaikan pada Muktamar Tarjih ke XXII, 1989.
Shalah, Ibnu. Taqrib al-Tadrib, Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyah, tth.
Siregar, Habibi. Otoritarianisme Hukum Islam, Yogyakarta: LKIS, 2014.

Published

2021-12-31

How to Cite

Otoritas Sahih Bukhari Sebagai Kitab Hadis Rujukan Dalam Hukum Islam. (2021). Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum, 18(2), 236-252. https://doi.org/10.32332/istinbath.v18i2.3171