Ratio Decidendi Of Religious Court Judges On Rejection Of Applications For Interfaith Marriage Prevention
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32332/istinbath.v18i1.3018Keywords:
Ratio decidendi, prevention, interfaith marriage.Abstract
This study aims to determine the basis of the judge's consideration (Ratio Decidendi) of the South Jakarta Religious Court Judge in Decision Number 3358/Pdt.G/2018/PA.JS, and the legal impact. In the decision, the panel of judges decided that the applicant's application to apply for the prevention of interfaith marriage was rejected. Whereas in the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) Articles 40 and 44 state that interfaith marriages are prohibited. Likewise, Article 61 states that religious differences can be used as reasons for preventing marriage. The Indonesian Ulema Council also issued a fatwa declaring the prohibition of interfaith marriages as stated in the MUI fatwa Number 4/MUNAS/VII /MUI/8/2005. This research is normative juridical research, using a case approach. The results showed that the judge's basic considerations rejected the application for marriage prevention because there was no legal basis that strictly prohibited interfaith marriages and the lack of legal and administrative steps to prevent the marriage. The implications of this decision for the litigants provide an opportunity for the respondent to continue their interfaith marriage.
References
Amri, Aulil. “Perkawinan Beda Agama Menurut Hukum Positif dan Hukum Islam.” Media Syari’ah : Wahana Kajian Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial 22, no. 1 (May 6, 2020): 48–64. doi:10.22373/jms.v22i1.6719.
Asiyah, Nur. “Kajian Hukum Terhadap Perkawinan Beda Agama Menurut Undang-Undang Perkawinan Dan Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan 10, no. 2 (2015): 204–14.
Cahaya, Nur. “Perkawinan beda agama dalam perspektif hukum Islam.” Hukum Islam 18, no. 2 (August 1, 2019): 141–56. doi:10.24014/hi.v18i2.4973.
Dio Permana Putra. “Makna Pasal 2 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan Terkait Syarat Sah Perkawinan Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Sejarah Dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010.” Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum 0, no. 0 (January 6, 2015). http://hukum.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/1102.
Harahap, Yulkarnain, and Andy Omara. “Kompilasi Hukum Islam Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perundang-Undangan.” Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 22, no. 3 (2010): 625–44. doi:10.22146/jmh.16245.
Herawati, Andi. “Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI) Sebagai Hasil Ijtihad Ulama Indonesia.” HUNAFA: Jurnal Studia Islamika 8, no. 2 (December 17, 2011): 321–40. doi:10.24239/jsi.v8i2.367.321-340.
Hermawan, Dadang, and Sumardjo Sumardjo. “Kompilasi Hukum Islam Sebagai Hukum Materiil Pada Peradilan Agama.” YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Dan Hukum Islam 6, no. 1 (August 16, 2016): 24–46. doi:10.21043/yudisia.v6i1.1469.
Jhony Ibrahim. Teori Dan Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2006.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2005.
Romi Hardhika. “Ketentuan Mengenai Saksi Keluarga Dalam Perceraian - PN Tanah Grogot.” Mahkamah Agung Indonesia: Pengadilan Negeri Tanah Grogot Kelas II, July 30, 2020. https://www.pn-tanahgrogot.go.id/info-perkara/uncategorised/ketentuan-mengenai-saksi-keluarga-dalam-perceraian.
Salinan Putusan Nomor 3358/Pdt.G/2018/PA.JS Tentang Perkara Penolakan Permohonan Pencegahan Nikah, No. 3358/Pdt.G/2018/PA.JS (Pengadilan Agama Jakarta Selatan November 12, 2019).
Sarifudin. “Kawin Beda Agama Dalam Kajian Hukum Islam Dan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia | Sarifudin | Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam.” Al-Istimbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam 4, no. 2 (2019): 213–30. doi:10.29240/jhi.v4i2.787.
Setiyanto, Danu Aris. “Larangan Perkawinan Beda Agama Dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia.” Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perundangan Islam 7, no. 1 (September 19, 2017): 87–106. doi:10.15642/ad.2017.7.1.87-106.
Wahyuni, Sri. “Perkawinan Beda Agama di Indonesia dan Hak Asasi Manusia.” IN RIGHT: Jurnal Agama dan Hak Azazi Manusia 1, no. 1 (March 24, 2017). http://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/syariah/inright/article/view/1215.
Zainal Asikin. Hukum Acara Perdata Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2018.
Zuhrul Anam. “Saksi Keluarga Terhadap Semua Jenis Alasan Dalam Perkara Perceraian.” Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia: Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Agama, March 4, 2019. https://badilag.mahkamahagung.go.id/artikel/publikasi/artikel/saksi-keluarga-terhadap-semua-jenis-alasan-dalam-perkara-perceraian-oleh-zuhrul-an
