PATH ANALYSIS ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT AND MICRO CULTURE AGAINST LEADERSHIP LECTURER IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Authors

  • Tulus Suryanto Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
  • Abdul Rahmat Gorontalo State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32332/akademika.v23i1.1127

Keywords:

Organizational Commitment, Micro Culture, Leadership

Abstract

Abstract

This study aims to examine organizational commitment and micro culture towards lecturer leadership. Population in this research is all lecturer at State University of Gorontalo, obtained by sampel counted 62 people by using random sampling technique. Data collection techniques used are, tests, questionnaires and documents. Data analysis technique used is inferential analysis. Test of normality of regression data, test of regression coefficient significance, linearity test of regression equation, and hypothesis test using path analysis. The results showed that: (1) there is a direct influence of organizational commitment from the calculation of coefficient value of path X1 to Y obtained value   = 0.615. Based on the results of the calculation of the significance of the path coefficient obtained tcount = 8.023 and ttable = 2.001 at the level of significance a = 0.05 with degrees of freedom (db) = 59. Because the value of tcount = 8.023> ttable = 2,001 it is concluded that the coefficient of path X1 to Y is significant; (2) there is direct influence of campus micro culture from calculation of coefficient value of path X2 to Y obtained value = 0,363. Based on the results of the calculation of the significance of the path coefficient obtained tcount = 4.759 and ttable = 2.001 at the level of significance a = 0.05 with degrees of freedom (db) = 59. Because the value of tcount = 4.759> ttable = 2,001 it is concluded that the coefficient of path X2 to Y is significant; (3) there is direct influence of organizational commitment to micro culture from result of calculation of coefficient value of path X1 to X2 obtained value = 0,753. Based on the calculation of significance test the path coefficient obtained tcount = 8.852 and ttable = 2,000 at the level of significance a = 0.05 with degrees of freedom (db) = 60. Because the value of tcount = 8.852> ttable = 2,000 it is concluded that the coefficient of path X1 to X2 is significant. Thus, the lecturer's leadership can be improved through organizational commitment and campus micro culture so that lecturers continue to improve their performance.

 

Keywords: Organizational Commitment, Micro Culture, and Leadership

 

Abstrak

Studi ini ditujukan untuk mengkaji komitmen organisasi dan budaya mikro terhadap kepemimpinan dosen. Populasi dari penelitian ini adalah semua dosen Universitas Negeri Gorontalo dengan sampel sebanyak 62 yang ditentukan secara acak. Data penelitian dikumpulkan melalui tes, kuesioner, dan dokumen. Data dianalisis secara inferensial menyakup tes normalitas regresi, tes signifkansi koefisien regresi, tes linearitas dan ekuasi regresi, dan analisis jalur untuk pengujian hipotesis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) terdapat hubungan langsung antara komitmen organisasi berdasar perhitungan koefisien analisis jalur X1 terhadap Y dengan nilai  0,615. Hasil perhitungan signifikansi analisis jalur didapatkan t-hitung 8,023 dan t-tabel 2,001 pada tingkat signifikansi 0,05 dengan derajat kebebasan 59. Karena ­ t-hitung > t-tabel, disimpulkan bahwa koefisiensi jalur X1 terhadap Y adalah signifikan; (2) terdapat hubungan langsung antara budaya mikro kampus berdasar perhitungan nilai koefisien jalur X2 terhadap Y sebesar 0,363. Hasil perhitungan signifikansi koefisien analisis jalur didapatkan t-hitung 4,759 dan t-tabel 2,001 pada tingkat signifikansi 0,05 dengan derajat kebebasan 59. Karena ­ t-hitung > t-tabel, disimpulkan bahwa koefisiensi jalur X2 terhadap Y adalah signifikan; (3) terdapat hubungan langsung antara komitmen organisasi terhadap budaya mikro berdasar perhitungan nilai koefisien jalur X1 terhadap X2 sebesar 0,753. Hasil perhitungan signifikansi koefisien analisis jalur didapatkan t-hitung 8,852 dan t-tabel 2,000 pada tingkat signifikansi 0,05 dengan derajat kebebasan 60. Karena ­ t-hitung > t-tabel, disimpulkan bahwa koefisiensi jalur X1 terhadap X2 adalah signifikan. Dengan demikian, kepemimpinan dosen dapat ditingkatkan melalui komitmen organisasi dan budaya mikro kampus sehingga para dosen dapat terus meningkatkan kinerja mereka.

 

Kata kunci: komitmen organisasi, budaya mikro, dan kepemimpinan

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbas, Nurhayati. Bahan Ajar Statistik Penelitian. Gorontalo Indonesia: PPs Universitas Negeri Gorontalo Press, 2016.
Amiruddin, Ahmad. Masalah Klasik Pendidikan Kita, dalam: Mengurai ”Benang Kusut” Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta. Indonesia: Badan Pertimbangan Pendidikan Nasional., 2013.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. Manajemen Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta., 2000.
Coulter, Mary. Management. Seventh Edition. International Edition. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International, Inc., 2003.
Dadhich and K. T. Bhal. “Bhal, Ethical Leader Behavior and Leader-MemberExchange as Predictors of Subordinate Behaviors.” Journal for DecisionMakers 33 (2008): 4.
Daft, Richard L. Management. Sixth Edition. Ohio: Thomson South-Western. [37] Fernald, L. Dodge, and Peter S. Fernald, (1999). Introduction to Psychology. Fifth Edition. Delhi: Publisher Distributors (regd)., 2003.
Franzoi, Stephen L. Social Psychology. Madison: Brown & Benchmark. Madison: Brown & Benchmark Publishers., 1996.
Gelfand, M. J., M. Higgins. L. H. Nishii, J. L. Raver, A. Dominguez, F. Mukakami, S. Yamaguchi, and M. Toyama. “Culture and Egocentric Perceptions in Conflict and Negotiation.” Journal of Applied Psychology 2002 (2002): 833–845.
Gibson, James L., John M. Ivancevich, James H. Donnelly, Jr. Organizations: Behavior, Structure, Processes. Chicago: Richard D. Irwin., 1997.
Hadi, S. Metodhology Research I. Jakarta. Indonesia: Andi Offset, 2017.
Himawan Bayu Patriadi, M. Z. A. B. “Human Security in Local Wisdom Perspective: Pesantren and its Responsibility to Protect People.” Procedia Environmental Sciences Journal Volume 28 (2015): 100–105.
Hodge, B.J., William P. Anthony, and Lawrence Gales. Organization Theory: A Strategic Approach. Fifth Edition. International Edition. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International, Inc., 1996.
Hoy, Wayne K., and Cecil G. Miskel. Educational Administration; Theory, Research, Practice. Sixth Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1991.
Jehn, K. A., and E. A. Mannix. “The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance.” Academy of Management Journal 2001 (2001): 238–251.
Judge, Stephen P. Robbins dan Tomothy A. Organizational behavior. Jakarta. Indonesia: Salemba Empat Press, 2008.
Kinicki, Angelo, and Robert Kreitner. Organizational Behavior. Key Concepts, Skills & Best Practices. International Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill & Irwin., 2003.
Li, Baowen, ˈmeng Zou, dan ˈyufei Guo. “Business Process Analysis and Optimization on Road Traffic Law Enforcement of the Beijing Intelligent Traffic Management.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 138 (2014): 748–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.252.
Naor, M., Goldstein, S., M., Linderman, K., W. and Schroeder, R., G. “The role of culture as driver ofquality management and performance: infrastructure versus core quality practices.” Decision Sciences 39 (2008): 671–702.
Neil Barnwell. Organization Theory, Concepts and Cases. Fourth Edition. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall / Pearson, 2002.
Neuman. Social Research Methods; Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Cambridge Mass: A Pearson Education Company, 2016.
Noe, Raymond A., John R. Hollenbeck, Berry Gerhard, and Pattrick M. Wright. Fundamental of Human Resources Management. New York: McGraw-Hill / Irwin, 2014.
Nur Khusniyah Indrawati. “Management by Inspiration: Implementation of Transformational Leadership on Business at Pondok Pesantren) Sunan Drajat.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences Volume 115 (2014): 79–90.
Rahmat, Abdul. “Clustering in Education” XX, no. 3 (2017): 311–24.
Robbins, Stephen P. Organizational Behavior. Eleventh Edition. International Edition. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall / Pearson., 2005.
Schermerhorn, John R., Jr. Management. Eighth Edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2005.
Soekanto, Soerjono. Sosiologi, Suatu Pengantar. Edisi Baru Keempat. iJakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, 1997.
Stoner, James A.F., R. Edward Freeman, and Daniel R. Gilbert, Jr. Management. Sixth Edition. International Edition. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International, Inc., 2005.
Sugiyono. Business Research Methods (Quantitative Approach, Qualitative, and R & D). Sixteenth print. Bandung: Alfabeta Press, 2012.
———. Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta., 1999.
Wall, Jr., J. A., and R. R. Callister. “Conflict and Its Management.” Journal of Management 21, no. 3 (2015): 517–23.
———. “Conflict and Its Management. Journal of Management.” Journal of Management 21 (1995): 517–523.

Downloads

Published

2018-07-15

Issue

Vol. 23 No. 1 (2018): Good Coorporate Governance dan Manajemen Lembaga Pendidikan Islam

Section

Articles

License

All articles in the Akademika can be disseminated on condition that they still include the identity of the article and the source (Akademika). The publisher is not responsible for the contents of the article. The content of the article is the sole responsibility of the author.
 
Authors who publish this subject agree to the following terms:
 
First, the Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right from first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Secondly, the authors can enter into a separate or an acknowledgment of its initial (e.g., post-institutional repository or publish it in a book) publication in this journal.
 
Third, the authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before publishing work is cited.